Why Do the Youth on My Caseload Harm Themselves? Communications As a Possible Factor in Youth Deliberate Self-Harm
By Allison M. Cook
It is common knowledge that children who have
experienced maltreatment are at additional risk
for mental health difficulties throughout their lives.
Although currently not considered its own mental
health disorder, youth who engage in deliberate
self-harm (DSH) behaviour are more likely to have
experienced maltreatment in their lives (Zoroglu et
al, 2003). It is important for social workers,
psychologists and counsellors alike to gain
knowledge about this potentially life-threatening
behaviour in order to provide effective services to
youth who self-harm.
DSH is defined in the literature as “deliberate, direct
destruction of body tissue without conscious
suicidal intent, but resulting in injury severe enough
for tissue damage to occur” (Gratz, 2006, p.1) and
can appear in a number of forms including cutting,
burning, head banging and suffocation, to name
only a few. Other names for DSH exist including
self-mutilation and ‘parasuicidal acts’. This type of
behaviour has been observed throughout history;
however, due to its grisly nature, empirical research
concerning why individuals may engage in such
behaviour has only begun in the past few decades.
DSH has historically been thought to be a symptom
of only the most severe psychiatric problems and
was not considered to be an issue in the general
population. Although DSH is linked to some
diagnoses including major depression, borderline
personality disorder, eating disorders and posttraumatic
stress, recent research has shown an
increase in this problem among community samples
of people who do not fit the criteria for a mental
health disorder. This increase in DSH is particularly
apparent among populations of youth studied.
World-wide, research has shown that in the general
population, the prevalence of self-harm among
adolescents is typically much higher than that of
adults (Evans, Hawton, Rodham and Deeks, 2005 for adolescent prevalence; Welch, 2001 for adult
prevalence).
DSH is very dangerous and it is possible for people
to die from it. Accidental death may result when
someone underestimates the lethality of their
methods or overestimates the likelihood of rescue.
This kind of mistake may be particularly common
among youth who may lack judgment or have a
perception of invincibility common to young people.
Those who self-harm as youth are also more likely
to commit intentional suicide later in life. There is a
need for early intervention to prevent this from
happening.
Given that DSH is viewed as distinct from suicidal
behaviour, it is very difficult for most people to
understand why someone would hurt themselves
without the wish to die. The lack of knowledge of
the factors contributing to engaging in DSH
prevents the development of a gold standard for
assessment, prevention and treatment of this
behaviour. What we do know is that many youth who
hurt themselves have experienced adverse life
circumstances such as maltreatment and so
Children’s Aid Services workers may find that many
of the youth on their caseloads engage in it.
Some researchers have taken the approach that this
behaviour would not be done or maintained unless
it served some sort of purpose for the person. One
of the functions of self-harm supported by
adolescents is a social-positive-reinforcement
function which refers to youth being able to gain
attention from those around them, solicit assistance
or increase support in their social networks by self harming.
An alternative is that DSH is a maladaptive
coping mechanism used to manage negative
emotions. This function, known as affect-regulation,
has received the strongest support and it has been found that youth experience intense negative
emotions that go away once DSH is done. DSH can
also serve a self-punishment function which fits
historical reports that say many people engaged in
such acts to relieve themselves of their perceived
wrong-doings. Functions that receive modest
support in the literature are sensation-seeking, to
release suicidal thoughts without risking death (antisuicide),
to manipulate others (interpersonal influence)
and to assert one’s autonomy or affirm
the sense of self as different from others
(interpersonal boundaries).
It is possible that certain people are naturally placed
more at risk for engaging in DSH due to their
biological make-up (Joyce et al, 2006). Certain
forms of some genes have been found to be more
common among people who self-harm and so there
may be a biological mechanism that makes it more
likely that self-harm will be chosen as a coping
mechanism for certain people. There is support for
this biological theory of DSH in that many people
who do it tend to have higher pain tolerance. Also,
when someone is hurt, their body releases
endorphins, chemicals that make us feel good. This
phenomenon has been referred to as ‘cutters high’
and leads to DSH having an addictive quality, likely
to be repeated, increasing in frequency and
intensity.
As mentioned previously, the experience of
childhood maltreatment is more common among
youth who engage in DSH than those who do not.
But why is this the case? What is it about childhood
maltreatment that makes someone more likely to
hurt themselves? Research has only recently been
done to answer this question and the results are
very specific to the population studied and by type
of abuse experienced. One study found that a high
level of self-criticism acts as a mediator in the link
between maltreatment and self-harm. Children who
are emotionally abused become overly critical of
themselves and as they grow use self-harm as a way
to punish themselves when they perceive that they
are not good enough. It has also been suggested that symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder
(PTSD) mediate the relationship between sexual
abuse and self-harm. One of the symptoms of PTSD
is dissociation or a feeling of being detached from
or outside of one’s body. An episode of dissociation
often precedes an act of self-harm and people report
that feeling pain helps them to feel anchored and
reminds them that they are real and alive when they
feel disconnected from ‘being’ in the physical sense.
Some other reasons survivors of trauma may use
DSH include to express trauma-related feelings of
rage, frustration, guilt and shame or as a method of
re-enacting the trauma that occurred. By engaging
in activities that recreate the physical or emotional
events that took place at the time of the trauma, the
survivor may be attempting to remember an event
that was blocked due to its traumatic nature, or to
communicate to herself or to others what occurred.
Re-enactment may also be an attempt to master a
situation that was previously not manageable for the
survivor, or an effort to regain a sense of control
and power in a situation where they previously felt
completely powerless. Being able to harm oneself
and then choose when and how to stop the pain
allows the survivor to have this sense of control.
Experiencing maltreatment as a child has a number
of consequences as an individual grows and any of
these could contribute to a youth using DSH. One
consequence of maltreatment that has been
documented among toddlers is a reduced ability to
express oneself. Children who have been maltreated
do not have the same communication abilities as
their non-maltreated peers and this is particularly
true of the toddler describing their own internal
states, such as how they are feeling. Although this
effect of maltreatment has only been studied in
young children, it is possible that the effects remain
as they grow. In adolescence, the ability to express
ourselves becomes very important, as peer
relationships become a priority and romantic
relationships begin to form.
When the communication demands of the environment
become too great, a youth may use self-harm
as a way of expressing themself. A study done with
university women supports the idea that a lack of
ability to communicate about feelings may contribute
to DSH. Specifically, it was found that having
experienced maltreatment reliably distinguished the
women who self-harmed from those who did not,
but the level of what the author calls ‘emotional inexpressivity’
determined the frequency of DSH.
A communication function of DSH has long been
documented among people with developmental disabilities
as a way to elicit help or attention from
their caregivers. Although the stereotypic self-harm
among this population is different from that seen
among typically-developing youth, there may be
similar factors contributing. Many adolescent self-harmers
give “to show how desperate I am feeling”
or “I wanted to be noticed” as reasons that they self-harm
and youth who engage in DSH have been
found to have less people they feel they can talk to.
Using data from the Maltreatment and Adolescent
Pathways (MAP) project at the Centre for Addiction
and Mental Health under the supervision of Dr.
Christine Wekerle, a study is currently being done to
see if there is an association between a youth’s basic
communication abilities and their use of DSH. If
this link is supported, it may point to new approaches
for prevention and treatment of self-harm
and may indicate an importance of workers providing
a safe place for youth to express themselves and
in teaching them how to do so. It is hoped that a
better understanding of deliberate self-harm among
youth who have experienced maltreatment will help
in the development of effective services for these
young people.
About the Author
Allison M. Cook is a Master of Education Student
at the University of Western Ontario in the Counselling
Program, working on a thesis from the Maltreatment
and Adolescent Pathways (MAP) Project dataset,
with Dr. Christine Wekerle, Associate Professor, Education, Psychology and Psychiatry, The University
of Western Ontario.
Recommended Readings
Beeghly, M. and Cicchetti, D.(1994). Child maltreatment,
attachment, and the self system: Emergence
of an internal state lexicon in toddlers at high social
risk. Development and Psychopathology, 6, 5-30.
Evans, E., Hawton, K., Rodham, K. and Deeks, J.
(2005). The prevalence of suicidal phenomena in
adolescents: A systematic review of populationbased
studies. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behaviour,
35(3), 239-250.
Favazza, A.(1998).The coming of age of selfmutilation.
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease,
186(5), 259-268.
Glassman, L.H., Weierich, M.R., Hooley, J.M., Deliberto,
T.L. and Nock, M.K. (2007). Child maltreatment,
non-suicidal self-injury, and the mediating
role of self-criticism. Behaviour Research and Therapy,
45, 2483-2490.
Gratz, K. (2006).Risk factors for deliberate self-harm
among female college students: The role and interaction
of childhood maltreatment, emotional inexpressivity,
and affect intensity/reactivity. American
Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 76(2), 238-250.
Joyce, P.R., McKenzie, J.M., Mulder, R.T., Luty, S.E.,
Sullivan, P.F., Miller, A.L., and Kennedy, M.A.
(2006). Genetic, developmental and personality correlates
of self-mutilation in depressed patients. Australian
and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40,
225-229.
Klonsky, E.D. (2007). The functions of deliberate self
-injury: A review of the evidence. Clinical Psychology Review, 27, 226-239.
Zoroglu, S.S., Tuzun, U., Sar, V., Tutkun, H., Savas,
H.A., Oztruk, M., et al (2003). Suicide attempt and
self-mutilation among Turkish high school students
in relation with abuse, neglect and dissociation.
Previous article: Outcomes of a Supplemental Learning Program for Children in Care at Family and Children's Services of Renfrew County
Next article: KARE Plan - Health and Dental Benefits for Children in Care |